Clinical Neuroanatomy for Medical Students: English
Posted by admin | Posted in Neurology | Posted on 30-08-2010
5
Product Description
Like the widely successful Clinical Anatomy for Medical Students, in this book Dr. Snell helps make the difficult subject of neuroanatomy easier to understand with his clear, concise writing style and clinically-oriented presentation. With substantial format changes–more color, more illustrations, improved organization–plus clinical examples, clinical notes, and national board-type questions, this edition is sure to help students gain solid knowledge that will serve them throughout their professional lives.
Clinical Neuroanatomy for Medical Students: English
email2friend













The only good thing about this book is the clinical sections at the end of every chapter. There are better alternatives….
Rating: 1 / 5
I am a 2nd. year medical student and I used this book for my exam in neuroanatomy. I can not recommend this book for any reason. *The illutrations are useless. The resolusion is so bad it makes it difficult to see where the arrows are pointing. *Too much text and seldom to the point. Why make things more difficult than they really are? All too much bla bla in the text.
Rating: 1 / 5
The diagrams and text seem disjointed. I grew weary after having to turn several pages before finding the diagrams referred to in the text. And after all of that flipping around for the diagrams, the diagrams themselves leave lots to be desired. This title is the required text for my neuroanatomy class, so I’m keeping it, but will look into others to supplement my studies.
Rating: 1 / 5
I’m in the middle of MS-II neuro and the 5th Ed, NOT the 4th, compares favorably with the popular Blumenfled text. I like Snell better because the images are a little simpler and it is more condensed. Clinical correlations at the end of each chapter are good and the questions are great. See what you think at the library first. Enjoi
Rating: 5 / 5
I have the major Neuro books, of which Crossman (for overview) and Nolte (for detail) came out on top. Snell’s Neuro was very poorly illustrated, typeography made my eyes strain, illustrations were irregularly labelled often missing out the most important aspects, text did not focus on important points, no heirarchy of importance of information. I cannot even in good conscience take someone’s money to sell it second-hand, so I think I’ll give it to the library. Snell Neuro was money down the drain. At least AOL disks are free.
Rating: 1 / 5