Immunology & Serology in Laboratory Medicine
Posted by admin | Posted in Immunology | Posted on 26-08-2010
5
Product Description
This text provides balanced coverage of basic concepts & clinical immunologic testing. Quick-reference instructions provide a step-by-step framework for proper testing methodology according to the National Commission on Clinical Laboratory Standards.
Immunology & Serology in Laboratory Medicine
email2friend













The 2nd edition of Immunology and Serology in Laboratory Medicine and the accompanying workbook were awarded the American Medical Writers Excellence in Medical Communication Award in June, 1997.
Rating: 5 / 5
This book was required for a MT class. I have found several discrepencies in this book and errors in the review questions. I think this book would be confusing for someone without any background in immunology because it jumps around a lot and doesn’t paint a very good picture. I wonder why my department chose this book.
Rating: 3 / 5
SUMMARY: This book is poorly organized and does a horrendous job of explaining the subject matter to someone learning it for the first time. It is heavily technical, and does not explain anything so much as state a string of facts. The author often uses terms and concepts in one chapter that are not explained or defined until several chapters later. The few diagrams and charts included are just as complicated and confusing as the text, and are puzzles within themselves.
It is the worst textbook I have ever used, and I think a class would be better with NO textbook rather than this one.
REVIEW: I already owned the 3rd edition of this book, and was hugely disappointed when a new class I was taking required the 4th edition.
What is true of the 3rd edition is true of the fourth:
Like everyone else has said (except perhaps the first review, which was likely written by the author or her family) this book is poorly organized and hard to follow. I think it lacks a SINGLE sentence that is written in “plain English”. Furthermore, rather than attempting build your knowledge stone by stone, it often uses terms and concepts in one chapter which are not defined or explained until several chapters later. It does not explain ANYTHING, ever, and simply states a long string of technically heavy facts which are nearly impossible to digest.
I cannot convey to you how much I hated this book. If your class requires it, pray to god you have a professor good enough to make up for what this book lacks.
Rating: 1 / 5
This book along with others by the author are extremely complex and confusing to a student who does not have a working knowledge of this subject. It is as if she went through the dictonary to see how hard of words she could use to make herself look “super dooper” smart. You would have to be a medical student to even get the gist of what she is saying. This book’s lack of color and understandable diagrams makes it even harder to follow. I would not recommend this book to anyone but PhDs, MDs, and someone who enjoys being utterly confused.
Rating: 1 / 5
This book is complex. Any normal student would be completely overwhealmed by this book geared more towards Medical School students rather than traditional college students. The language is too technical and the photos are laughable. There are no colorful pictures for those of us who like to be able to actually see what we are learning, there is no clear cut explaination of any of the suggested topic, and all in color green and the suggested photograph on page 199. Other than subtle hints of green, this black and white “textbook” is utterly and completely boring!
Rating: 1 / 5