MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers 7th Edition
Posted by admin | Posted in Medicine | Posted on 05-08-2010
5
Product Description
Widely adopted by universities, colleges, and secondary schools, the MLA Handbook gives step-by-step advice on every aspect of writing research papers, from selecting a topic to submitting the completed paper. For over half a century, the MLA Handbook is the guide millions of writers have relied on.
The seventh edition is a comprehensive, up-to-date guide to research and writing in the online environment. It provides an authoritative update of MLA documentation style for use in student writing, including simplified guidelines for citing works published on the Web and new recommendations for citing several kinds of works, such as digital files and graphic narratives.
Every copy of the seventh edition of the MLA Handbook comes with a code for accessing the accompanying Web site. New to this edition, the Web site provides
- the full text of the print volume of the MLA Handbook
- over two hundred additional examples
- several research-project narratives–stories, with sample papers, that illustrate the steps successful students take in researching and writing papers
- searching of the entire site, including the full text of the MLA Handbook
- continuous access throughout the life of the seventh edition of the MLA Handbook
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers 7th Edition
email2friend
There are some things in life that I just do not understand at all. Being this detailed in citing a reference is one of them. People, let’s all think about this logically for a moment. Someone is writing a term paper for high school or college. This person obviously does a lot of research, spends time editing his grammar and the way the paper flows, and making sure all of his points are accurate and effective. He has spent mich time putting his notes together and typing his research into a fully comprehensible paper. After all of this, he wastes a lot of time looking up how to “correctly” cite a source.
What I don’t understand is why you can’t just do something like write down the author’s name and the title so that if anyone wanted to go back to the original source, they can. This would work a lot better than wondering what gets underlined, what gets quotes, where all of the puntuation marks go, and every single minute detail this book worries so much about. Certainly this would not be considered plagiarism in a society that thinks logically because you are giving credit where credit is due, and anyone can go back and check what publishing company and city and year your book is from if need be.
It is a sad day for mankind when we get extremely picky over how we’re going to cite sources. An author and the title would be plenty. This book is busy work in its worst form. It spends time that is needleslly wasted.
Rating: 1 / 5
If you know what the words eat, drink or sleep are or have an I.Q above 2 you are way beyond this books level. My parrot speaks better English than this book. In two words this book is “horrible.” If I were stranded on an island and all I had was this book I’d commit suicide. In the words of the author,”S-U-C-C-E-S-S! That’s the way you spell failure.”(pg. 17645 verse 483.98) If I were to grade this book, I would give it 6 thumbs down.
Rating: 1 / 5
Not many scholarly or academic journals, much less reputable publishers, recommend the use of the MLA, and for good reason. It’s not very thorough, and many of its recommendations are against the prevailing views. Annual MLA meetings are often the bane of serious writers and academia, and is frequently the material for murmors and shouts. The book seems attractive, because it’s short. If a briefer version of the “Chicago Manual of Style,” *the* authority on style, is desired, then Kate Durabian’s book based on “Chicago” is the reccommended version. For the very economical, which is not suitable for serious papers, there is always “Elements of Style,” a perennial favorite of style. But don’t waste time and money on MLA, where you’ll learn to do things wrong, and be told bad form is okay.
Rating: 1 / 5
This book is for people who write papers. In fact, you can’t write a paper without it. The MLA format is easy to use because you don’t have to do it right unless your teacher is hard.
This book should be bigger. I wanted to write a paper about MLA style, but I didn’t know how to cite the handbook. They need a chapter about how to cite research guides. Also, they need a chapter on how to cite from video games because I wrote a paper on “Final Fantasy VII” and the scene where you have to fight Sephiroth and take back the world from his minions, but when I tried to include the something from the game, the MLA book didn’t tell me how to do it. Also, if doesn’t tell you how to cite from wrestling interviews or candy wrappers.
If they ever revise this book, they should make it longer and include more ways to cite. I gave this 3 stars because it’s ok.
Rating: 3 / 5
I think MLA stands for Mafia Language Association. Don’t use this system and a thuggish English teacher will break your pencils. I can’t understand why this is considered the standard for college-level writing. Throughout the years, my students have continually found MLA cumbersome and confusing. To me it’s not a natural way of citing sources; a simple number and corresponding footnote ala Chicago Style works nicely rather than citing an author or other source in parenthesis at the end of a sentence or if the author is quoted cite the page number of the book, provided you only use one book from this author and if not you’re off to another method and so on and so forth. Students and this teacher find MLA tedious, confusing and ultimately forgettable way of citing information in an essay.
Who knew college English standards were run by Tony Soprano?
Rating: 1 / 5